Marble bust of Aristotle, a Roman copy of a Greek original

Aristotle. Roman marble copy of a Greek bronze by Lysippos, about 330 BC; the alabaster mantle is modern. Palazzo Altemps, Rome. Image: Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

We become generous, Aristotle thought, by giving. She asked what happens when we give for the wrong reason.

Emily Hwang and the Billionaire’s Hospital

A Very High Commendation in Philosophy at the John Locke Institute’s 2026 Global Essay Prize

Emily Hwang, a junior at The Hotchkiss School, received a Very High Commendation in Philosophy at the John Locke Institute’s 2026 Global Essay Prize, an honor reserved for essays that reach the final round of judging. She has been my student since she was in elementary school in Korea.

Her question: “Is it ever wrong to do the right thing for the wrong reasons?”

The hospital

She opened with a billionaire who gives a hundred million dollars for a children’s hospital. Hundreds of children are saved. The gift was designed by his tax lawyers and saves him more than it costs. Nothing illegal happened. Is anything wrong?

Her first move was to ask: wrong for whom? She separated three things the question usually blurs together: the person who acts, the person who receives, and the moral system itself. Then she imagined two identical worlds, one in which the billionaire gives from compassion and one in which he gives for the tax benefit, and noticed the only difference between them: reliability. Generosity that depends on a tax code will vanish with the tax code. “That alignment is not morality,” she wrote. “It is a coincidence.”

Kant, Aristotle, and a thief

With Kant she drew the line between acting in accordance with duty and acting from it, and showed how the children become a means to the billionaire’s ends. With Aristotle she argued that the vain giver does not merely fail to grow more generous; he grows more vain, because we become what we repeatedly do.

Between them she placed something no one else would have thought to put there: the good thief, Dismas, crucified beside Christ, and the Church’s old distinction between perfect and imperfect contrition. The word itself is Latin, from conterere, to grind to pieces. The Church, she observed, had decided centuries before Kant that a confession made for the wrong reason is not a lesser confession but no confession at all.

The last line

Her conclusion is worth quoting whole: “When reasons do not matter, morality becomes a transaction. And transactions, unlike virtue, end when the price is no longer right.”

I have taught Emily for most of her life, and I have watched that kind of sentence arrive slowly, over years of reading. It does not come from a weekend of essay coaching. Students in grades 9 to 12 who want to write at this level can apply to Humane Letters, which begins November 21 and 22.

In Korean, with our administrator: book a phone call · chat on KakaoTalk

In English, with Ioannes Magister: book a Zoom call · message on WhatsApp

Or write to contact@emersonlatin.com.

Get word when something new is posted.

Join Our Mailing List

More from the Record